Thread: Stage Four

It doesn’t exist. But we keep hoping.

Welcome! You are invited to wander around and read all of the comments that have been posted here at Patton & Co., but as soon as you register you can see the bid limits that Alex, Peter and Mike propose for each player, and you can post your own comments. Registering is free, so please join us!

I'd be interested in a NL if its done on a night or weekend. 

van wilhoite LVW
May 15

I'd be game to try an NL only, for sure. If anyone else wants to play chime in. 

Peter Kreutzer Rotoman
May 15

The spreadsheet is set up so that we enter the player name in a descending list. The cell is linked to a roster somewhere, and once the name is added the roster autofills with stats using vlookup. It is really remarkably clever. Somehow that updates the standings, which auto sort on most points, all in the matter of a second or so.

And, I think it will run well on most computers because the major processing takes place in Google's cloud.

Peter Kreutzer Rotoman
May 15

Peter -- Well if you hear about an NL-only league and need someone I'd be up for it. Side note: I still don't understand how you are figuring out the stats on the fly unless someone is just copying and pasting them in.

Kent Ostby Seadogs
May 15

LynchMob: I think dumping one cat is effectively dumping two, so might as well start out dumping two, but you may be right. Planning on one may keep more options open. If I took Klesko instead of Goodwin I would end up with two fewer points. Klesko's strength was a good BA with 21 homers and 80 RBI. Goodwin actual scored eight more runs than Klesko and stole umpteen more bases, which I valued. 

I've been playing around replacing my guys in the endgame and haven't found a better finish available to me. I think if I take Rickey Bottalico instead of Steve Parris I gain points but don't pass Jeff. No doubt I'll do some more of that.

Peter Kreutzer Rotoman
May 14

Seadogs: I believe NL and AL only would increase dumping. The key here is that if you compete in 10 cats you're going to end up doing poorly in one or two of them, and those stats are wasted, so you get more efficient by consciously not paying for one or two stats. That increases your efficiency. 

Peter Kreutzer Rotoman
May 14

Have there been any NL-only or AL-only drafts? I think that would lower the ability to do well and punt multiple categories.

Kent Ostby Seadogs
May 14

Why not "Better figure out a path to dump one category, not two or three"?

If you had taken Klesko with your last OF pick, would Fred still have won?

Howard Lynch LynchMob
May 14

It was a tough night. For the first time I wasn't in the lead early, because I took no hitters, but after fleshing out a staff I had 12 wins points and 11 saves points and great qualitatives, with three pitchers left to buy. But then the rot set in. As I'm putting together an offense, teams with bad ERAs and WHIPs start loading up on bad pitchers with plenty of wins and saves. I made up some ground with Pariss and Veres late, but then they chipped away and it hurt.

For the third try I didn't pay enough attention to position scarcity, and I think that was the difference. All the top productive catchers except Pudge went a couple rounds early (Pudge couldn't have gone earlier). I made sure to get my middle infielders done, so I could take advantage of outfielders late, and I didn't worry about catchers because there were a few low AB ones with decent batting averages that I figured would be there. What happened, however, was that I needed  80 runs and could only eek out about 40, while Fred was able to jump over a bunch of teams in Runs and RBI with Klesko. Fred was able to do that because he took two good catchers early. 

The thing about not planning to dump a category is you can end up wasting picks adding stats that you end up not using. On the other hand, there is definitely an advantage to dumping one category, as Fred did, rather than three, as Jeff and I did.

One interesting tidbit is that Paul, Justin and Al, three of our four newbies, competed in all 10 categories and finished fifth, eighth and 11th. Newbie Eric, who planned on punting saves only, finished fourth. I'm not sure Ron and Scott planned on dumping cats, but they finished next to last in six categories and in 10th in two more. while finishing 10th and 12th. 

The teams with the most wins are the teams with the worst ERAs, for the most part, while the teams with the best ERAs are the teams with best ERAs, generally. This isn't a surprise, but it argues for choosing to go one way or the other. My effort to win all five pitching categories was likely doomed from the start.

My lessons this time: Better factor in position scarcity. Make a pitcher or outfielder your last choice. Better figure out a path to dump two categories, not three.

Peter Kreutzer Rotoman
May 14

When everyone knows what players are going to do, it's impossible for any one team to run away from the pack. I think that's the main thing.

I'll be doing one more of these (next Wednesday, also 1999). Now that we all know what we're doing, it's become something of a grind; I imagine it will be my last.

The question is, how do I play it? I'm trying to think outside the box and find myself boxed in.

Maybe I'll give my spot up to Peter. He's come this close each time.

Alex Patton Alex
May 14