Miguel Tejada Kansas City Royals

Age: 47 (May 25, 1974) | 5' 9" | 220lbs. | Bats: Right Minors: 3b-4
Tm Lg YEAR G AB R H BB SO 2B 3B HR RBI SB CS BA OBP SLG BB% SO% BABIP G/L/F % $4x4 $5x5
SD NL 2010 156 636 71 171 30 67 26 0 15 71 2 0 .269 .312 .381 4 10 .280 n/a 16 16
SF NL 2011 91 322 28 77 12 35 16 0 4 26 4 4 .239 .270 .326 3 10 .254 55/13/31 4 4
BAL AAA 2012 36 135 10 35 11 16 5 0 0 18 1 0 .259 .329 .296 7 11 .294 n/a
KC AL 2013 53 156 15 45 6 25 5 0 3 20 1 0 .288 .317 .378 4 16 .326 50/21/30 5 5
MIA AA 2014 4 14 2 5 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 .357 .357 .429 0 14 .417 n/a
Career 16yrs 2171 8434 1230 2407 553 1079 468 23 307 1302 85 38 .285 .336 .456 6 12 .295 n/a
Welcome! You are invited to wander around and read all of the comments that have been posted here at Patton & Co., but as soon as you register you can see the bid limits that Alex, Peter and Mike propose for each player, and you can post your own comments. Registering is free, so please join us!
No, I do think he's going to keep declining. $24 factors in position scarcity. Plus the possibility that he might not decline. But if I didn't think he will, I'd put a bid limit closer to $30.
Alex Patton Alex
Dec 14 '07
In the Guide I have his price at $25, so we don't disagree by much. I think I might think he might bounce back this year more than you., and you don't seem to think he's going to keep declining.

One thing I may have overlooked, his .330 batting average obscures the decline in his 2006 SA. Things look more dire on the power front if it's more like .470.
Peter Kreutzer Rotoman
Dec 12 '07
I dunno, Peter. I see a guy with steadily declining SA since 2004.
Alex Patton Alex
Dec 12 '07
Breaking news: Tejada lands in Houston, causing more magazine rewrites. Next year I'm cracking down on team references in the profiles.

He says he got out of focus because of the O's ineptitude and asked to end up with a winner. Why there is no chance that would be the Orioles is a sad story, though understandable given the Yanks and Red Sox dominance in the division. The Astros don't have that problem, and they have a strong lineup now.

If PEDs were the reason for his power shouldn't he have deflated in 2005 with testing?
Peter Kreutzer Rotoman
Dec 12 '07