Tm | Lg | YEAR | W | L | SV | Hld | G | GS | IP | H | HR | BB | SO | ERA | WHIP | Rating | BB/9 | SO/9 | BABIP | G/L/F % | $4x4 | $5x5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DET | AL | 2006 | 17 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 30 | 186.0 | 187 | 21 | 60 | 124 | 3.63 | 1.33 | 1.34 | 2.9 | 6.0 | .293 | n/a | 20 | |
DET | AL | 2007 | 18 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 32 | 32 | 201.2 | 181 | 20 | 67 | 183 | 3.66 | 1.23 | 1.21 | 3.0 | 8.2 | .294 | n/a | 25 | 23 |
DET | AL | 2008 | 11 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 33 | 33 | 201.0 | 195 | 18 | 87 | 163 | 4.84 | 1.40 | 1.32 | 3.9 | 7.3 | .305 | n/a | 1 | 6 |
DET | AL | 2009 | 19 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 35 | 240.0 | 219 | 20 | 63 | 269 | 3.45 | 1.18 | 1.17 | 2.4 | 10.1 | .328 | n/a | 31 | 30 |
DET | AL | 2010 | 18 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 33 | 33 | 224.0 | 190 | 14 | 71 | 219 | 3.38 | 1.17 | 1.10 | 2.9 | 8.8 | .299 | n/a | 26 | 25 |
DET | AL | 2011 | 24 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 34 | 34 | 251.0 | 174 | 24 | 57 | 250 | 2.40 | 0.92 | 0.95 | 2.0 | 9.0 | .247 | 40/18/42 | 52 | 44 |
DET | AL | 2012 | 17 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 33 | 33 | 238.0 | 192 | 19 | 60 | 239 | 2.65 | 1.06 | 1.05 | 2.3 | 9.0 | .286 | 42/22/36 | 35 | 33 |
DET | AL | 2013 | 13 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 34 | 34 | 218.0 | 212 | 19 | 75 | 217 | 3.47 | 1.32 | 1.28 | 3.1 | 9.0 | .327 | 38/23/39 | 12 | 17 |
DET | AL | 2014 | 15 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 32 | 32 | 206.0 | 223 | 18 | 65 | 159 | 4.54 | 1.40 | 1.37 | 2.8 | 6.9 | .327 | 40/20/41 | -1 | 5 |
DET | AAA | 2015 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 8.1 | 10 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 3.24 | 1.44 | 1.32 | 2.2 | 13.0 | .465 | n/a | ||
DET | AL | 2015 | 5 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 20 | 133.0 | 113 | 13 | 32 | 113 | 3.38 | 1.09 | 1.12 | 2.2 | 7.6 | .276 | 35/20/46 | 11 | 12 |
DET | AL | 2016 | 16 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 34 | 34 | 227.1 | 171 | 30 | 57 | 254 | 3.05 | 1.00 | 1.08 | 2.3 | 10.1 | .267 | 34/19/48 | 34 | 34 |
DET | AL | 2017 | 10 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 28 | 28 | 172.0 | 153 | 23 | 67 | 176 | 3.82 | 1.28 | 1.28 | 3.5 | 9.2 | .296 | 34/24/42 | 11 | 14 |
HOU | AL | 2017 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 34.0 | 17 | 4 | 5 | 43 | 1.06 | 0.65 | 0.75 | 1.3 | 11.4 | .197 | 32/20/48 | 14 | 11 |
HOU | AL | 2018 | 16 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 34 | 34 | 214.0 | 156 | 28 | 37 | 290 | 2.52 | 0.90 | 1.01 | 1.6 | 12.2 | .290 | 29/20/51 | 42 | 40 |
HOU | AL | 2019 | 21 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 34 | 34 | 223.0 | 137 | 36 | 42 | 300 | 2.58 | 0.80 | 0.95 | 1.7 | 12.1 | .235 | 36/19/45 | 55 | 49 |
HOU | AL | 2020 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6.0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 3.00 | 0.67 | 1.08 | 1.5 | 10.5 | .092 | 62/0/38 | 6 | 4 |
Career | 16yrs | 226 | 129 | 0 | 0 | 454 | 454 | 2986.1 | 2538 | 310 | 851 | 3013 | 3.33 | 1.13 | 1.15 | 2.6 | 9.1 | .292 | n/a |
Welcome! You are invited to wander around and read all of the comments that have been posted here at Patton & Co., but as soon as you register you can see the bid limits that Alex, Peter and Mike propose for each player, and you can post your own comments. Registering is free, so please join us!
Dec 15 '12
I felt like Verlander and Price were very close, and in this case I think (because I didn't weigh in beforehand) I would have picked Verlander. But choosing a guy to repeat after a year that isn't nearly as dominant is hard, call it fatigue, which is why I understand the edge to Price. Not a bad pick at all.
Nov 14 '12
1 Verlander
2 Price
3 King Felix
4 Weaver
5 Rodney (Yes, Rodney isn't the 5th most valuable pitcher in the league, but he was cool)
Oct 3 '12
Price had a much better RAA in his no decisions 1.56(1.56 ERA) than Verlander 3.72(3.56 ERA), though JV did have the edge in RAA and ERA in wins(1.18 to 1.89) and losses with the biggest edge being in the losses(5.30 for JV and 7.62 for DP).
The Rays did have the better bullpen by far. The biggest question the voters will have to answer as far as conventional wisdom is do you deny the league winner in Wins, ERA, and RAA the award.
Sep 30 '12
But, another thing to consider is that Verlander has had the second worst defense in the league behind him, just slightly better than KC and significantly worse than the next worse team. DER of .677 v league average of .694. (All that Cabrera at 3B - among other poor defensive choices). Meanwhile, TB has one of the best defenses, 4th in the league and solidly above the league average. DER of .702.
Run support over the entire game started not just when they were in the game was 3.98 for Verlander; 4.76 for Price.
Sep 30 '12
1. Rangers- JV 2; DP 2
2. Yankees- JV 3; DP 5
3. Angels- JV 1; DP 2
4. Red Sox- JV 3; DP 5
5. White Sox JV 2; DP 0(scheduled to face them today).
Bottom 5 teams same thing
1. Mariners JV 1; DP 0
2. Indians JV 3; DP 1
3. Royals JV 4; DP 1
4. Rays JV 2; DP 0 obviously
5. A's JV 2; DP 2
Unearned runs can't be ingnored as if the pitcher is totally blameless because most every UnER that scores the pitcher is responsible for either allowing the batter that scores to reach base or allowing the batter to drive in the run that reached on the error.
Unearned Runs Allowed: Verlander 10; Price 3.
Sep 30 '12
Sep 29 '12
Aug 30 '12
Lats year Verlander had a .247 BABIP with a infield fly% of 10.9; this year is infield fly% is an incredible 16.1% and even with that his BABIP is up 35 points with that LD% increase.
Aug 30 '12
I had no idea his BABIP was that low last year.
Aug 29 '12