Tm | Lg | YEAR | W | L | SV | Hld | G | GS | IP | H | HR | BB | SO | ERA | WHIP | Rating | BB/9 | SO/9 | BABIP | G/L/F % | $4x4 | $5x5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LAA | A+ | 2018 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6.1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 1.42 | 0.47 | 0.39 | 1.4 | 8.5 | .144 | n/a | ||
LAA | AL | 2018 | 9 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 30 | 180.0 | 171 | 27 | 45 | 180 | 4.15 | 1.20 | 1.30 | 2.2 | 9.0 | .305 | 41/24/35 | 9 | 14 |
LAA | AAA | 2019 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4.1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 0.00 | 0.69 | 0.58 | 2.1 | 20.8 | .474 | n/a | ||
LAA | AL | 2019 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 18 | 95.0 | 93 | 20 | 30 | 118 | 4.93 | 1.29 | 1.45 | 2.8 | 11.2 | .328 | 34/23/44 | 1 | 6 |
LAA | AL | 2020 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 | 66.2 | 63 | 9 | 19 | 70 | 4.46 | 1.23 | 1.29 | 2.6 | 9.4 | .314 | 39/22/39 | 10 | 14 |
LAA | AL | 2021 | 6 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 18 | 94.0 | 92 | 16 | 31 | 113 | 5.27 | 1.31 | 1.40 | 3.0 | 10.8 | .333 | 33/25/41 | -0 | 4 |
NYY | AL | 2021 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 5 | 35.2 | 38 | 13 | 10 | 37 | 7.32 | 1.35 | 1.75 | 2.5 | 9.3 | .282 | 32/15/53 | -4 | -2 |
LAD | NL | 2022 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 10.0 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 16 | 0.00 | 0.70 | 0.55 | 2.7 | 14.4 | .247 | 45/20/35 | 4 | 3 |
Career | 9yrs | 33 | 38 | 0 | 0 | 123 | 114 | 643.2 | 626 | 114 | 182 | 666 | 4.66 | 1.26 | 1.38 | 2.5 | 9.3 | .308 | n/a |
Welcome! You are invited to wander around and read all of the comments that have been posted here at Patton & Co., but as soon as you register you can see the bid limits that Alex, Peter and Mike propose for each player, and you can post your own comments. Registering is free, so please join us!
more weird stats
Apr 12
Dodgers rotation candidate
Mar 26
Hit batters I'm sure are in both equations, LVW, since they count as runners on base, and I imagine both formulas place a lot of emphasis on strand rates.
In an article posted yesterday at The Athletic, Eno Sarris argues that when a pitcher has established that he's pretty good at stranding runners and suddenly doesn't, we should give him a mulligan. Heaney's LOB% last year was 68%, compared to 73% in his career. He's one of Eno's bounceback candidates.
Jan 7
Carlos Martinez had the lowest strand rate (58.5%) among the 70+ IP guys. 11 Hit batsmen in 82 IP(Alex does this factor in to underperforming ERA?). Relievers inherited 7 of his runners that scored after he left the game.
Jan 4
I bet the Dodgers' proprietary system has him closer to the Forecaster's numbers than Bill James's number.
Jan 4
The Bill James Handbook's component ERA (ERC) for Heaney: 4.78.
The Baseball Forecaster's expected ERA (xERA) for Heaney: 4.19.
Heaney's combined ERA pitching for two teams last year: 5.83.
Both systems clearly imply, all things being equal, his actual ERA should have been considerably lower.
And both systems clearly have different ways of calculating what his ERA should have been.
Heaney is at the very top of the Forecaster's ERA Underperformers list (minimum 70 IP), followed by Jesus Luzardo, Jorge Lopez, Dylan Bundy and Carlos Martinez.
The Forecaster cautions about Heaney: "xERA indicates some upside, but we've been saying that for 4 years."
Jan 4
2021: FB 59% FBv 92.0 EV 89.3 HardHit 39% Barrel 9% HR/FB 18% FIP 4.85
Dec 16 '21